toomanylokifeels:

seidrs:

real talk I have a huge problem with fanon’s Jotun Loki and I’ve never been one to advocate its tropes because of a handful of problematic reasons

Read More

No, this has been bugging me a lot too and I wasn’t sure if it would be appropriate for me to bring it up. I’m glad you said something. 

I talked before how I at least wish more designs were appropriate to Viking culture, because after all Jötnar come from Norse Mythology. Aside from it being more culturally appropriate, it would make more pragmatic sense. The one person on here that I think does this and does this well is Umakoo

Everything else seems to be an attempt to exotify the Jotuns to an extreme extent. The stereotypical way of exotifying any fictional culture seems to be based on the way western culture exotifies and “others” non-western cultures. I think that’s highly problematic. 

I’d personally prefer more attempts to not only make Jotun more culturally accurate to their origins in both cultural wear and traditions, but also to step away from further ‘othering’ of real and living non-western cultures. What is ‘exotic’ to one culture, is quite normal and every day to another. Constantly pointing it out or emphasizing it is not necessarily honoring or recognizing their culture and traditions in a respectful manner.  

Cultures develop based in part on their environment. Given the conditions that Jotun supposedly live in, the majority of tropes surrounding their fictional culture make zero pragmatic or functional sense, which leads me to believe that most choices being made in regards to how they live, act, and their cultural materials are based on an unfair and uneducated conflation of non-western cultures, the rampant othering and exotification of non-western cultures, and a failure to recognize diversity and uniqueness in western cultures. 

It’s tiring and even though they’re fictional, to a major extent it in effect, perpetuates some pretty awful stereotypes and the fact that people don’t think it’s problematic at all really bothers me. 

To say the truth, the treatment of Jotun-Loki has some extreme signs of orientalism even without the whole harem-and-gold cultural coding (though that’s really important and a huge part of his orientalisation). A major part of orientalisation of other countries (and thus othering them in a way that allows Western spectators to enjoy this country as something ‘inferior’ and non-threatening) is achieved by coding the cultures of these countries female/feminine (Edward Said’s book ‘Orientalism’ is still pretty interesting in this aspect, if slightly outdated by now).

Of course Loki is a bit of a special case, because in mythology, he is the god of Ergi, aka unmanly behavior, but even in mythology the female-coding is a lot less pronounced than in fandom.

Not only is Loki, in fanon, continually in the ‘female’ position in his relationship with Thor, but he is also again and again presented as physically inferior - not lanky and tall as Tom Hiddleston (who is of the same height as Chris Hemsworth), or slender muscle as comic-Loki, but small, delicate, lithe, often with pronounced hips or thighs and narrow shoulders. Moreover, every female connection he has in the comics - especially Amora - and every female connection he has in mythology (Sigyn and Angrboda mainly) are not only ignored, but eradicated by the  fandom! (The most extreme sign for this is that Fanon!Loki gave birth to the Three Enemies of the Gods himself, which denies even Angrboda’s very existence and cementing his femininity) (the exception for this are Hela and Frigga, but mother and daughter roles do not interfere with female-coding).

The thing here is, that’s similar to what oientalism does to men of (mostly) eastern cultures. They are presented as soft, as effeminate, as delicate, as subordinate, as - and this is still fucking pervasive - unable to use the logic of the ‘white man’ and thus unable to think reasonably at all, which in further consequence makes them dishonest. And I think that might be where a lot of fanon starts - Loki is the epitmone of dishonesty. Dishonesty is a female-coded trait in western culture. Dishonesty + femininity = seduction, and seduction again evokes images the of smoke-filled harem halls and smooth, ‘exotic’ bodies and artificial sort of behavior and motion that our culture codes ‘oriental’.

I have loads and loads of problems with fanon!Loki, but the exotization and feminization of him (which are things that have been going hand in hand since freaking Herodot) are definitely my biggest peeves.

awildellethappears:

thegreateuropeanbicycletour:

lotrconfessions:


I love Lord of The Rings. But I’m starting hate the fandom. They make anyone who hasn’t read the books or doesn’t know every detail feel so unwanted. The older fans or fans that know more need to stop acting superior, it’s downright disrespectful.


Sorry, but a fan who has actually read the book is superior to a fan who only claims to be a fan because they find Aidan Turner hot. 

Bullshit. This is a fandom, not a hierarchy, and everyone’s free to enjoy things on their own terms. If someone “only” finds Aidan Turner hot, well, yes, that’s definitely a different focus to people who prefer the books, but it’s neither mutually exclusive (I prefer Cate Blanchett, but hey!) nor inherently “lesser.”

I mean, I understand how film-fans feel left out in some discussions (I used to be a film fan for most of my life), but especially with the hobbit fandom, the film-version is just so much more fleshed-out and colorful than the book? I mean, don’t get me wrong, the hobbit book is a great read and all, but it’s a children’s book and it reads like a children’s book, while the movie has cultural aspects and a lot more character development and world development etc. pp.
I never really came upon the ‘book fans are superior’-thing during my film-fan days though, tbh… 
Also no one ‘claims to be a fan’ just because they ‘find Aidan Turner hot’. They are fans because they like his role, they like Kili, they like thinking about Kili, they like squeeing about Kili, and, guys, stop forgetting that ‘fan’ means ‘fanatic’, and that’s EXACTLY what many many of these people are, just as much as we.
‘Fan’ doesn’t mean ‘person who knows every single aspect of the world and system and what do I know’. That would be closer to a fandom scholar, which is a thing that exists, but is definitely not a required quality for a mere fan.

awildellethappears:

thegreateuropeanbicycletour:

lotrconfessions:

I love Lord of The Rings. But I’m starting hate the fandom. They make anyone who hasn’t read the books or doesn’t know every detail feel so unwanted. The older fans or fans that know more need to stop acting superior, it’s downright disrespectful.

Sorry, but a fan who has actually read the book is superior to a fan who only claims to be a fan because they find Aidan Turner hot. 

Bullshit. This is a fandom, not a hierarchy, and everyone’s free to enjoy things on their own terms. If someone “only” finds Aidan Turner hot, well, yes, that’s definitely a different focus to people who prefer the books, but it’s neither mutually exclusive (I prefer Cate Blanchett, but hey!) nor inherently “lesser.”

I mean, I understand how film-fans feel left out in some discussions (I used to be a film fan for most of my life), but especially with the hobbit fandom, the film-version is just so much more fleshed-out and colorful than the book? I mean, don’t get me wrong, the hobbit book is a great read and all, but it’s a children’s book and it reads like a children’s book, while the movie has cultural aspects and a lot more character development and world development etc. pp.

I never really came upon the ‘book fans are superior’-thing during my film-fan days though, tbh…

Also no one ‘claims to be a fan’ just because they ‘find Aidan Turner hot’. They are fans because they like his role, they like Kili, they like thinking about Kili, they like squeeing about Kili, and, guys, stop forgetting that ‘fan’ means ‘fanatic’, and that’s EXACTLY what many many of these people are, just as much as we.

‘Fan’ doesn’t mean ‘person who knows every single aspect of the world and system and what do I know’. That would be closer to a fandom scholar, which is a thing that exists, but is definitely not a required quality for a mere fan.

Headcanon - Maeglin Was Barely Legal

son-of-twilight:

virulentsedition:

son-of-twilight:

Maeglin was young when he died; 190!

For elves I think this is sort of the equidistant of 18-19. You’re an adult, you’re physically grown, you have adult responsibilities, Etc. 

But you’re still, essentially, a teenager. You’re not very wise, emotionally wacky, you may make really bad decisions.

Really bad decisions. 

The 18-19 mark would have been more around 50, actually, as they start maturing around then and have reached their adult height. They are fully grown by 100.

I dunno…  I know they’re fully grown at 100 but almost all fully grown human people I’ve met were done growing before they were legally adults. All they did after that was put on weight.

Even so~ Still young adult to me~

Humans start ‘maturing’ with about 12-14; women reach their full height (usually minus about an inch) when their period starts. Men usually keep growing properly until they’re 20, the rest-growth usually goes till 27, though few will gain more than half an inch from 20 to 27.

I have never heard of somebody ‘starting to mature’ with 18 or 19. They might not be completely baked out yet, but they definitely don’t just start puberty.

190 definitely is still VERY young for an Elf. And I can’t imagine that Maeglin was that much farther emotionally and psychologically than an average 18-year-old man, though he might have more knowledge and skill than a human 18-year-old could have.

agentlehobbit:

Ladies and gentlemen… I present to you: Olivia Wilde


cuntaggious:

-obliqueperfection-:

OMG IF YOU DON’T REBLOG I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOU I MEAN EVERYBODY NEEDS THIS ON THEIR BLOG LIKE SERIOUSLY OMG KJSDAF VKJSD AHFJKR HFKJE

HOLY OMG I CANT I CANT

cuntaggious:

-obliqueperfection-:

OMG IF YOU DON’T REBLOG I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOU I MEAN EVERYBODY NEEDS THIS ON THEIR BLOG LIKE SERIOUSLY OMG KJSDAF VKJSD AHFJKR HFKJE

HOLY OMG I CANT I CANT

abadpoetwithdreams:

Finwions! From left: little Feanor busy metalworking and hating everybody, little Finarfin, and little Fingolfin.

dynaroo:

poppyparrotlet:

By way of Parrotlet Babies.
(I like the p’let in the background of the bottom picture.)

dynaroo:

poppyparrotlet:

By way of Parrotlet Babies.

(I like the p’let in the background of the bottom picture.)

image

Aredhel/Eol and the Limits of Silmarillion Revisionism

lintamande:

Once you accept the idea that the Silmarillion is a biased historical document, it’s easy to start wondering how many other things didn’t happen exactly the way the text told us.

And one of the most tempting targets is the story of Aredhel and Eol,  because it involves two characters that are fandom favorites, because it’s the sort of story that would be ripe for historical reframing, and because of the tantalizingly ambiguous phrasing of the Silmarillion: “It is not said that Aredhel was wholly unwilling.”

But I feel like revisionist reinterpretations of this pairing tend to gloss over the genuinely terrible things Eol did and minimize the abusive nature of his relationship with Aredhel, and that bothers me. 

Here are the facts that would have been well-known by both Noldor and Sindar and very difficult for a future history to manipulate:

Aredhel highly valued the freedom to roam, even at great personal risk. She left Gondolin and passed through Nan Dungortheb alone. She was restless spending even a year in all of Himlad, which is one of the larger kingdoms of Beleriand. 

Eol made contact with her by using magic to make it impossible for her to leave her territory, so that when they first met she was completely dependent on him for help. He forbade her from ever leaving Nan Elmoth, going out in the sunlight, or making contact with her family or anyone she had ever known; he stopped her from even sending them a message, such that everyone she knew thought she was dead. 

When her son was fully grown and Eol was absent, they escaped and returned to Gondolin; Eol pursued them. Aredhel is dismayed to learn that he followed her to Gondolin, but does not want him killed.  On learning he could not leave Gondolin, he tried to kill Maeglin with a poisoned javelin, but hit Aredhel instead. He did not tell anyone that the javelin was poisoned or how to save her; she died that night. 

If we agree on that much, and agree that everything else is open to interpretation and biases, I think that’s enough to conclude that this pairing is deeply problematic and to explain why I’m really, deeply bothered by shipping it. 

Strong opinions below the read more. Trigger warning for discussion of rape and spousal abuse. 

Read More

send me a number and i’ll post what i think about you :~) 42

You’re a musical fan which is AWESOME, and you’re a Zirkler, so you likely know the one or other thing about creating fiction, which is even more awesome.

You’re also a great person who can hold half a conversation in capslock and that is awesome too 8D

(And if you picked 42 for the reason I think you did, then you’re even more awesome.)

So, awesome all around 8D